Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Supervalu Inc et al
as 3:2011cv03290
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
Supervalu Inc , Acme Sav-On Pharmacy , Albertsons Osco Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Barber v. Homewood Jewel Osco et al
as 1:2010cv07185
Plaintiff:
Marchel'le Barber
Defendant:
Homewood Jewel Osco, Village of Homewood Police Department, Unnamed Police Officers of the Village of Homewood Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubloff Development Group, Inc. et al v. SuperValu, Inc. d/b/a Jewel-Osco et al
as 1:2010cv03917
Plaintiff:
Rubloff Development Group, Inc. , Rubloff Mundelein LLC , McVickers Development LLC and others
Defendant:
SuperValu, Inc. d/b/a Jewel-Osco and The Saint Consulting Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tonerhead, Inc. v. Inktec Zone America Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv02420
Plaintiff:
Tonerhead, Inc.
Defendant:
Inktec Zone America Corporation, Retail Inkjet Solutions, Inc., Phoenix Ink Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jewel Food Store Inc v. Stephen Cicilline, Jr., et al
as 08-8006
Petitioner:
JEWEL FOOD STORES, INCORPORATED, doing business as JEWEL-OSCO, a New York Corporation
Respondent:
STEPHEN CICILLINE, JR., JAMES BATTERSON and CHRISTOPHER IOSELLO, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
