Cases 31 - 40 of 235
Saavedra-Moreno v. Maldonado
as 4:2023cv04200
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Saavedra-Moreno
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Soto v. Maldonado
as 3:2023cv50362
Petitioner:
Carlos Gutierrez Soto and Marcos Alvarez Lopez
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Delcid v. Maldonado
as 1:2023cv14926
Petitioner:
Jose Fredy Celcid and Jose Fredy Delcid
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Celcid v. Maldonado
as 4:2023cv04176
Plaintiff:
Jose Fredy Celcid
Defendant:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lyons v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Kevin Reichert, Sara McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Willis et al
as 3:2023cv02804
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Anthony Willis, Rob Jeffreys, Mr. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez Maldonado v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14738
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tanya Gonzalez Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Soto v. Maldonado
as 4:2023cv04175
Petitioner:
Carlos Gutierrez Soto
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cadenas v. Maldonado
as 4:2023cv04166
Plaintiff:
Robert Cadenas
Defendant:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maldonado v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12290
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ivette Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
