Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Knight v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2012cv00089
Plaintiff: George Knight
Defendant: Fort Wayne City of , Fort Wayne Police Department , Ti Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TI-Hud Investments I, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2010cv00146
Plaintiff: TI-Hud Investments I, L.L.C. and Tutera Inv., L.L.C.
Defendant: Congregation of the Resurrection
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00270
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Laksono et al v. Boeing Company et al
as 1:2008cv03325
Plaintiff: Indra Laksono, Indra Laksono, Indra Laksono and others
Defendant: Boeing Company, Boeing Company, Boeing Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00045
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00294
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Performance Aftermarket Parts Group, Ltd. et al v. TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC
as 4:2007mc00007
Movant: Airtek Products, LP
Plaintiff: Performance Aftermarket Parts Group, Ltd. and G & C Automotive Distributors, Inc.
Defendant: TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00014
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?