Cases 41 - 50 of 3,307
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Emad Samir Rezk Ayad v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2165
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
EMAD SAMIR REZK AYAD
Green v. Adkins
as 3:2024cv03134
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Lawrence P Green
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01209
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Childers v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01194
Petitioner:
James Leroy Childers
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Adkins
as 2:2024cv02114
Petitioner:
Juan Ortiz
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tarlochan Singh v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2004
Petitioner:
TARLOCHAN SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Williams v. Brown
as 1:2024cv01191
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Jeremiah Brown
Petitioner:
Jackie Lee Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner:
Joel Njus
Respondent:
Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
