Cases 41 - 50 of 304
al-Owhali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01399
Plaintiff:
Mohamed al-Owhali
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perkins v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01459
Plaintiff:
Harold Perkins
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Canady v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01537
Plaintiff:
Raevaughn Canady
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goolsby v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv50414
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Andre Goolsby
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Clinton Mercy Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01296
Plaintiff:
Willie James Smith
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Kassar v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Monzer Al-Kassar
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv50423
Plaintiff:
Braden Lamar Jordan and Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goolsby v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv05679
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Andre Goolsby
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Clinton Mercy Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anglin v. Heisner
as 1:2021cv04396
Plaintiff:
Lee Anglin
Defendant:
United States of America
Respondent:
MCC Warden, Bureau of Prisons and R.A. Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv01248
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nidez Garcia
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
