Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Spinks et al
as 1:2007cv02266
Plaintiff:
Helen Jones and Helen Jones
Defendant:
Angela Spinks, Reicci Realty, Millennium Financial Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. v. Bay Capital Corp.
as 1:2007cv00974
Plaintiff:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. and HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Defendant:
Bay Capital Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. v. David Piccinini et al
as 1:2007cv00941
Plaintiff:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. and HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Defendant:
David Piccinini, David Piccinini and LFM Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. v. American Freedom Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00723
Plaintiff:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. and HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Defendant:
American Freedom Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. v. American Pioneer Financial Services, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00725
Plaintiff:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. and HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Defendant:
American Pioneer Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Archer v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
as 1:2007cv00328
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Archer, Carolyn Archer, Carolyn Archer and others
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., AMC Mortgage Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
