Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morales et al v. Monreal et al
as 1:2013cv07572
Plaintiff:
Moises Morales , Montreal Thomas and Joaquin Rocha
Defendant:
Adam Monreal , S.A. Godinez and Pat Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Reynoso et al
as 1:2012cv07679
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Moises Reynoso and La Casa De Moy Y Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Gomez-Lopez v. Fairmont City IL et al
as 3:2012cv00901
Plaintiff:
Moises Gomez-Lopez
Defendant:
City of Fairmont City IL, Scott Penny, Shaun Benyr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Moises Lopez-Ontivero
as 12-1396
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MOISES LOPEZ-ONTIVEROS
Dominguez et al v. Tempus Car Spa, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01102
Plaintiff:
Christian Dominguez , Ricardo Villegas , Moises Alejandro and others
Defendant:
Tempus Car Spa, Inc. and Amberina Zafar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones et al v. Capital Grille Holdings, Inc. d/b/a The Capital Grille, GMRI, Inc. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00660
Plaintiff:
Keith Jones , Jared Cropps , Josephine Ogbenna and others
Defendant:
Capital Grille Holdings, Inc., GMRI, Inc. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Garcia v. Diane DG Reality, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv04271
Plaintiff:
Moises Almaras Garcia
Defendant:
Diane DG Reality, LLC, Diane Gottlieb, William Gottlieb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
