Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Keller v. Finks et al
as 3:2013cv03117
Plaintiff:
Corey Keller
Defendant:
Thomas Finks , Christian County Adult Probation Department and Amy Calvert Winans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Watt et al v. Papiernik et al
as 3:2012cv50410
Plaintiff:
Azalea Watt and Latrell Girley-Watt
Defendant:
John Papiernik, Winnebago County, Illinois and Winnebago County Juvenile Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gakuba v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2012cv07296
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Charles O'Brien, Michael Easton, Daniel Baisley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Manning v. State of Arizona et al
as 1:2012cv01019
Plaintiff:
Adaaiyah Manning
Defendant:
State of Arizona and Maricopa County Adult Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hamilton v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv06515
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Rahm Emanuel, Garry McCarthy, Marikay Hagertty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. United States Probation et al
as 1:2011cv05172
Petitioner:
Randall Bingham
Respondent:
United States Probation , State of Georgia and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hankins v. Burton et al
as 4:2011cv04048
Plaintiff:
Aimee Hankins
Defendant:
Dennis Burton, Sharp County Arkansas Probation Office, Gene Forsyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
