Cases 41 - 50 of 51
United States of America v. The Yahoo! account mckee.sean@yahoo.com
as 1:2011mc00363
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Yahoo! account mckee.sean@yahoo.com
United States of America v. The Yahoo! account mslaw75@yahoo.com
as 1:2011mc00362
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Yahoo! accounts mslaw75@yahoo.com
Firth et al v. Yahoo! Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Robert Firth, Fan Action Inc and Blue and Gold Com
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc, Yahoo! Inc, Tim Prister and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Stayart v. Yahoo! Inc
as 2:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Beverly Stayart
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Beverly Stayart v. Yahoo, et al
as 09-3379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEVERLY STAYART
Defendant - Appellee:
YAHOO!, INCORPORATED, OVERTURE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, A Delaware corporation, doing business as Alta Vista and VARIOUS, INCORPORATED
United States of America v. All records pertaining to the Yahoo log-in-name bjohnsonedwpubcom
as 1:2009mc00308
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
All records pertaining to the Yahoo log-in-name bjohnsonedwpubcom
United States of America v. All records of Yahoo! pertaining to the email account illinoisdonboy31@yahoo.com
as 1:2009mc00300
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
All records of Yahoo! pertaining to the email account illinoisdonboy31@yahoo.com
Stayart v. Yahoo! Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
Beverly Stayart
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc, Overture Services Inc. and Various Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spark Network Services, Inc. v. Match.Com, LP et al
as 1:2007cv00570
Plaintiff:
Spark Network Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Match.Com, LP, eHarmony. Com., Inc., Yahoo!, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.