Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Salud Natural Entrepreneur, Inc. v. Nutricentro Internacional, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04417
Plaintiff:
Salud Natural Entrepreneur, Inc.
Defendant:
Nutricentro Internacional, Inc., Netnutri.com, LLC., Frank Huerta and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA v. Pablo Huerta-Garcia
as 09-2567
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PABLO HUERTA-GARCIA
Huerta v. Village of Carol Stream et al
as 1:2009cv01492
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Huerta
Defendant:
Village of Carol Stream, Camillo Incrocci, Peter Spizziri and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv00506
Plaintiff:
James E Robinson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, C. M. Huertas and S. A. Difranco
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huerta v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ruben Huerta
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mims v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv06896
Plaintiff:
Pharris Mims, Pharris Mims and Pharris Mims
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Timothy Duggan, Omar Stover and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kubis v. Heslup et al
as 1:2008cv04894
Plaintiff:
Andrzej Kubis
Defendant:
R. Heslup, D. Benanati, Arreola and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Jose Aguilar-Huerta
as 08-2505
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE AGUILAR-HUERTA
Huerta v. McPhillips et al
as 1:2008cv03373
Plaintiff:
Oscar B. Huerta
Defendant:
Timothy McPhillips, Cook County Sheriff's Police Department and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huerta v. FedEx Ground et al
as 3:2008cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Huerta
Defendant:
FedEx Ground, FedEx Ground and FedEx Ground Package System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
