Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cundiff v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00440
Plaintiff:
Amani S Cundiff
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiel James Patrick LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06564
Plaintiff:
Kiel James Patrick LLC
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Decor Craft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aliano v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.
as 1:2016cv03372
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mario Aliano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Endo Health Solutions INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01832
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Endo Health Solutions Inc, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Geico Indemnity Company v. Dodd et al
as 3:2015cv01284
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Nathan Dodd, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. , Angela Stevens and others
Counter_claimant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Geico Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Geico Indemnity Company v. CVS Pharmacy Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01254
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Company
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc, Angela Stevens, Nathan Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
MIMMS ET AL. v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.
as 1:2015cv00970
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
