Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Barksdale et al v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 1:2009cv07309
Plaintiff:
Charles Barksdale and Ollie McKee
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schrader v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 1:2009cv05456
Plaintiff:
Kristine Schrader
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HAZELWOOD v. GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 1:2009cv00918
Plaintiff:
MARY R. HAZELWOOD
Defendant:
GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AARON CHASE and CHRIS (LAST NAME UNKNOWN)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Startare et al v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 1:2009cv04460
Plaintiff:
Joanne Startare, Joanne Startare, Mabel Perez and others
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nelson v. GC Services
as 3:2008cv00444
Plaintiff:
Madelyn Nelson and Madelyn Nelson
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wajidali v. GC Services, Limited Partnership
as 1:2008cv03852
Plaintiff:
Candice Wajidali
Defendant:
GC Services, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stumpff v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 1:2008cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kara Stumpff
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
