Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Clark v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv00297
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark, Sacorey Lennel Clark Trust, Sacorey Clark and others
Respondent:
John Doe, 3, United States, John Doe, 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mays v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2018cv01911
Defendant:
Lt John Doe #2, CO Jane Doe #4, CO John Doe #8 and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2018cv01944
Defendant:
Lt John Doe #2, CO John Doe #11, CO Jane Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Dickerson
Nominal Defendant:
Paul Kemper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra-Lopez, David v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2018cv00665
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (6), Lucas Weber and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Undetermined:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodyguard Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-11
as 1:2018cv03566
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-11 and John Doe 6
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bodyguard Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-34
as 1:2018cv02494
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-34 and John Doe 6
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rosetto v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv02292
Plaintiff:
Perry James Rosetto
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Salem Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosetto v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01131
Plaintiff:
Perry James Rosetto
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Salem Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sibley v. Cook County et al
as 1:2018cv02085
Plaintiff:
Moirsche Sibley
Defendant:
Cook County, City Of Markham, Markham Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuhaiber v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01371
Plaintiff:
Fadeel Shuhaiber
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, John Doe, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.