Cases 61 - 70 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Manzanares Aparicio et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv01418
Defendant:
Director Mirash Dedvukaj, Attorney General William Barr, Director Loren K Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Zeida Enid MANZANARES APARICIO, Mr Luis Eduardo GUIFARRO ZELAYA, Zeida Enid Manzanares Aparicio and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01315
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Port v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv00984
Defendant:
Chicago Field Office of the US Citizenship & Immigration Service, Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Howard Port
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
E. F. L. v. Bill Prim, et al
as 20-1200
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD F. WOLF, ROBERT GUADIAN and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
E. F. L.
Arredondo Velazquez v. Wolf et al
as 2:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Michael Paul, Kenneth T Cuccinelli and Chad Wolf
Plaintiff:
Laura Arredondo Velazquez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cisneros v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2020cv00815
Plaintiff:
Silvia Cisneros
Defendant:
Acting Director Chad Wolf, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
