Cases 61 - 70 of 128
Williams v. Sood et al
as 4:2018cv04030
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Williams
Defendant:
Kul B Sood, Lois Lindorff, R Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al.
as 3:2018cv50008
Plaintiff:
Harley T. Miller
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., John Vargo, Amber Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv50393
Plaintiff:
Harley T. Miller
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Amber Allen and Marshon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Scott, et al
as 3:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Scott, Steven Strubberg, Shane Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Siddiqui et al
as 3:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Dr Siddiqui, Dr Ritz and Wexford Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv06825
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, Wexford Health Services, Inc., John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatchett v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06060
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hatchett
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Obaisi, Don Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siever v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04223
Plaintiff:
Brad Siever
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halbrook v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04197
Plaintiff:
Michael Halbrook
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv00393
Plaintiff:
Gregory Conway
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Wexford Health Service. Inc., Paul Lewis Shicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
