Cases 81 - 90 of 358
Lyons v. Doe 1-18 et al
as 1:2022cv05846
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
John Doe 1-18, Jane Doe 1-14, Wexford Health Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wachter v. Meyers et al
as 3:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
Dr. Meyers, Jane Doe 1, Lieutenant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hargrow v. Jeffrey's et al
as 3:2022cv50289
Plaintiff:
Tray Hargrow
Defendant:
Rob Jeffrey's, Terry Williams, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurd v. Miles
as 1:2022cv03641
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Hurd
Defendant:
John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2, Jane Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tidwell v. Conner
as 3:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Cleother Tidwell
Defendant:
Danielle Conner, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and John/Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Naydenov v. Doe, et al
as 1:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
Andre Naydenov
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanders v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv01573
Plaintiff:
Robert Sanders
Defendant:
DeeDee Brookhart, C/O Wilson, C/O Mershoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Benzing et al
as 3:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
Antwon D. Jenkins
Defendant:
Kenny Benzing, John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
