Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,262
Moore Rivers v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07405
Plaintiff: Angela Danese Moore Rivers
Defendant: AFAM Concept, Inc. administrator d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., LOreal USA, Inc., LOreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07103
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Rivers v. LOreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06926
Plaintiff: Roselia Rivers
Defendant: LOreal USA, Inc., LOreal USA Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dyson v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00801
Plaintiff: Rachael M. Dyson
Defendant: Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Polansky et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00796
Plaintiff: Eric Polansky and Paradise Motors of Elkton
Defendant: Forest River Inc, Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation and Cummins Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Johnson v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00798
Plaintiff: Kathryn Johnson
Defendant: Forest River Inc and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Crowder v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00799
Plaintiff: Logan L. Crowder
Defendant: Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Armstrong v. The United States Federal Government et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv04139
Plaintiff: Ryan Christopher Armstrong
Defendant: The United States Federal Government, The State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05948
Plaintiff: Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Ningbo Exhibest Display Equipment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Longgang District Bainatong Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Superhype Tapes, Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05834
Plaintiff: Superhype Tapes, Ltd.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, Linyi Banner Exhibition Advertising Media Co., Ltd., A -Type Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?