Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Allen v. Crow et al
as 3:2024cv02158
Defendant:
Crystal Crow and Latoya Hughes
Plaintiff:
Devereaux Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01934
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Nurse James, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv50331
Defendant:
Lt. McBride, Mr. Livingston, Walberg and others
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Crow et al
as 3:2024cv01831
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, John/Jane Doe 2, John/Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis E White, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv06067
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Bernarde, Aidan Lau, Fraser Perring and others
Defendant:
Crowe LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: the Matter to Enforce Subpoena Issued to Crowe LLP
as 1:2024cv06069
Petitioner:
Fraser Perring, Gabriel Bernarde, Viceroy Research LLC and others
Respondent:
Crowe LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Adamczyk v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01689
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Illinois Department of Corrections and Christel Crow
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adamczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamczyk v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03178
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adamczyk
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, LaToya Hughes and Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coultas v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01650
Plaintiff:
John Coultas
Defendant:
J. Saddler, Clayton Stephenson, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Kimberly et al
as 3:2024cv01371
Defendant:
Sgt Belford, Placement Office, Warden Kimberly and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
