Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Zwald v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2024cv04489
Plaintiff:
Amanda Zwald
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Berendt et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04310
Plaintiff:
HUGO ORELLANA, XAVIER KING, WILLIAM BERENDT and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
McGreevy et al v. AT&T INC.
as 1:2024cv04097
Plaintiff:
STEVE SENTI and KELLY MCGREEVY
Defendant:
DirecTV, Inc. and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chernik v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Zachary Chernik
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and DIRECTV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Boykin v. AT&T, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02973
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Smith v. Village Of Crestwood et al
as 1:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
Briana D. Smith
Defendant:
Village Of Crestwood, Crestwood Police Department, Corley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. AT&T, Inc
as 1:2022cv01486
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
John McPherson, Rosemary Arias, Sean Burke and others
Defendant:
Wynndalco Enterprises, LLC, Hoan Ton-That, Jose Flores and others
In Re:
Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Amicus Curiae:
Duke Law First Amendment Clinic, Professor Eugene Volokh, Professor Jane Bambauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
