Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Briseno v. Syngenta Crop LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00953
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Fernando Briseno
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cabello v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16862
Plaintiff:
Juan Cabello
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Hector L Briseno and Cara M McSparron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Briseno v. Jiju et al
as 1:2022cv05190
Plaintiff:
Alex Briseno
Defendant:
John Jiju, 2210310 Ontario, Inc. d/b/a Dynamic Freight Haulers, Jiju John and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Briseno v. Thithi Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04186
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Briseno
Defendant:
Thithi Restaurant Inc., Thi Thi Pham and Tam Nguyen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv04932
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", frerodelavegafans.com, Phil Shaver and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Briseno v. Door and Window Guard Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv08963
Defendant:
Door and Window Guard Systems, Inc. and James Heagney
Plaintiff:
Hector Briseno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Briseno v. Perkins et al
as 2:2014cv02263
Plaintiff:
Juan Briseno
Defendant:
Cpl. Perkins, Sheriff Bukowski, C/O Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bilik v. Harding et al
as 1:2014cv05140
Plaintiff:
Richard Bilik
Defendant:
Harding, Wright, Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
