Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Woods v. Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01211
Defendant:
City of Bloomington and Weston Gresham
Plaintiff:
Eric Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Kintone Lewis
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Matthew Summers and City of Bloomington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Nicholas Doage, Jeff Linden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Adam Stone, Taylor Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCray v. Melchor et al
as 1:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Rochelle McCray
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Stephen Brown, Kerri Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Melchor et al
as 1:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Tony L Robinson
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Kerri Johnson, Mathew Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. City of Bloomington Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert P Young
Defendant:
City of Bloomington Illinois, States Attorney of McLean County and Michael Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kelly v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2022cv01032
Plaintiff:
Todd A Kelly, Jr
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Justin Shively, Todd Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Janssen et al
as 1:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Catherine Melton
Defendant:
Bryce Janssen, BLOOMINGTON, IL and City of Bloomington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
