Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Cervantes v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 3:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Rafael Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
Darrion Brown v. City of Urbana, Illinois, et al
as 24-1809
Plaintiff:
DARRION BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS, RICHARD SURLES, MICHAEL CERVANTES and others
Rutledge v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Terry Donald Rutledge and Terry Rutledge
Defendant:
Brian English, Aaron Smith, Shaun Dwyer and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Aurelio Cervantes
as 24-1226
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AURELIO CERVANTES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO CERVANTES
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTONIO CERVANTES
Cervantes v. Abbott Laboratories
as 1:2023cv16966
Plaintiff:
Saira Cervantes
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montalvo v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03264
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Cervantes Montalvo
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Juan Cervantes v. USA
as 23-2857
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN J. CERVANTES
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RHOADES et al v. CERVANTES
as 1:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
RUDY CERVANTES d/b/a MODERN FLOOR COVERING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cervantes v. Willis et al
as 3:2023cv02176
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cervantes
Defendant:
Anthony D Willis, Daniel C Porter, Alex A Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
