Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14528
Plaintiff:
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Cudahy, CultureSquad and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
JMS Development Company v. Bulk Petroleum Corporation, et al
as 20-1182
Defendant / Appellee:
EVELYN ZALTZMAN, ARTHUR ZALTZMAN, LASALLE NATIONAL TRUST, NA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JMS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Singh et al
as 1:2014cv02522
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Satnam Singh, Darshan K. Singh and RSD Singh, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United Central Bank v. Dhaliwal et al
as 1:2009cv06083
Plaintiff:
United Central Bank and United Central Bank
Defendant:
Darshan Dhaliwal and Debra Dhaliwal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
United Central Bank et al v. JT Petroleum, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv05952
Plaintiff:
United Central Bank, United Central Bank and Jaspal Singh Dhaliwal
Defendant:
JT Petroleum, LLC, Darshan Dhaliwal and Debra Dhaliwal
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Mutual Bank, N.A. v. Dhaliwal et al
as 1:2009cv03659
Plaintiff:
Mutual Bank, N.A. and Mutual Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Darshan Dhaliwal and Debra Dhaliwal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Petroleum & Franchise Funding LLC v. Dhaliwal et al
as 2:2009cv00353
Plaintiff:
Petroleum & Franchise Funding LLC, Petroleum & Franchise Funding LLC and Petroleum & Franchise Funding LLC
Defendant:
Darshan S Dhaliwal and Debra A Dhaliwal
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
