Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hugler v. Dura-Fibre LLC
as 1:2017cv00589
Defendant:
Dura-Fibre LLC
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hugler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Michael Opela v. R. Alexander Acosta, et al
as 17-1788
Petitioner:
MICHAEL OPELA
Respondent:
EDWARD C. HUGLER, APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC., TUBELITE, INC. and others
R. Alexander Acosta v. Ashley Furniture Industries
as 17-1765
Petitioner:
EDWARD C. HUGLER, Acting Secretary of Labor and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Respondent:
ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Hugler v. Palo Foods Inc
as 2:2017cv00519
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hugler
Defendant:
Palo Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Hugler v. Ashton Group LLC
as 1:2017cv02032
Petitioner:
Edward C. Hugler
Respondent:
Ashton Group LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Hugler v. Ashton Group LLC
as 1:2017cv02038
Petitioner:
Edward C. Hugler
Respondent:
Ashton Group LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ned Stevens Gutter Cleaning &, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 17-1555
Petitioner:
NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING & GENERAL CONTRACTING OF CONNECTICUT, LLC and NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING & GENERAL CONTRACTING OF NEW YORK, LLC
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EDWARD C. HUGLER, Acting Secretary of Labor
Hugler v. Beltway Hospitality, LLC
as 1:2017cv01182
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hugler
Defendant:
Beltway Hospitality LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Ned Stevens Gutter Cleaning & v. OSHA, et al
as 17-1216
Petitioner:
NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING & GENERAL CONTRACTING OF TEXAS, LLC
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EDWARD C. HUGLER, Acting Secretary of Labor
Ned Stevens Gutter Cleaning & v. OSHA, et al
as 17-1216
Respondent:
EDWARD C. HUGLER, Acting Secretary of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Petitioner:
NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING & GENERAL CONTRACTING OF TEXAS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
