Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ADA - Discrimination
National Exchange Bank and Tru v. Tanknology, Incorporated
as 14-1850
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK AND TRUST, as Trustee for the Fife Family Trust A
Defendant - Appellant:
TANKNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
National Exchange Bank and Tru v. Zurich American Insurance Com, et al
as 14-1852
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK AND TRUST, as Trustee for the Fife Family Trust A
Defendant - Appellant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY
National Exchange Bank and Tru v. Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc., et al
as 13-3478
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK AND TRUST, as Trustee for the Fife Family Trust A
Defendant - Appellant:
PETRO-CHEMICAL SYSTEMS, INC., MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY, TANKNOLOGY, INC. and others
National Exchange Bank and Trust v. Petro-Chemical Systems Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
National Exchange Bank and Trust
Defendant:
Petro-Chemical Systems Inc, Mid-Continent Casualty, Tanknology Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
National Exchange Bank & Trust et al v. Windridge Co. et al
as 2:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
National Exchange Bank & Trust
Defendant:
Windridge Co, WDG Company, Hugh Joel Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowling v. Rector et al
as 1:2007cv04509
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Bowling
Defendant:
Joe Rector, Dewade Langely, D.W. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
USA v. Certain Real Property commonly known as W5874 Bend Rd Princeton WI
as 2:2007cv00253
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Certain Real Property commonly known as W5874 Bend Rd Princeton WI
Claimant:
Therese Mans, Farmers Exchange Bank and Christopher G Mans
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
