Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richard Blevins, et al v. International Brotherhood of T, et al
as 20-2977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD BLEVINS, EDDIE RIZZO, GERALD JANES, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, International Union and TERRY HANCOCK
Wendt v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00910
Plaintiff:
Frank B Wendt
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Logan v. Cady et al
as 3:2013cv01163
Plaintiff:
Eugene Logan
Defendant:
Lori A Cady, Frank B. Eovaldi, C/O Mayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank B. Nose, Jr., et al v. Zimmer,Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv04405
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Nose, Jr. and Patricia J. Nose
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis, Frank v. Wienkes, Margaret et al
as 3:2013cv00389
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Davis
Defendant:
Margaret Wienkes , Chelsea Balzan, Nicole Raisbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Dulinsky et al
as 3:2012cv00483
Plaintiff:
Steven C Hill
Defendant:
Frank B Dulinsky and Jose F Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGinnis, Frank v. Brown County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
Frank B. McGinnis
Defendant:
Brown County Jail, Aramark Correctional Service, Correctional Healthcare Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv08237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barghouti v. Holder et al
as 3:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
D. Holder, Frank B. Eovaldi, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
