Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
FTC v. Day Pacer LLC, et al
as 24-1289
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant: DAY PACER LLC, a limited liability company, formerly known as COLLEGE CRITERIA LLC, doing business as EDUTREK, doing business as EDSOUP, doing business as OUR SCHOOL SEARCH, doing business as COLLEGE INFO AND DEGREE SPOTS, successor EDUTREK, L.L.C., EDUTREK LLC, a dissolved limited liability company doing business as EDSOUP, RAYMOND L. FITZGERALD, individually and as an officer of DAY PACER LLC and EDUTREK LLC and others
FTC v. Day Pacer LLC, et al
as 23-3310
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: DAY PACER LLC, a limited liability company, formerly known as COLLEGE CRITERIA LLC, doing business as EDUTREK, doing business as EDSOUP, doing business as OUR SCHOOL SEARCH, doing business as COLLEGE INFO AND DEGREE SPOTS, successor EDUTREK, L.L.C., EDUTREK LLC, a dissolved limited liability company doing business as EDSOUP, RAYMOND L. FITZGERALD, individually and as an officer of DAY PACER LLC and EDUTREK LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05751
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Parra v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv05936
Defendant: Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Plaintiff: Jose L. Parra, individually and on behalf of all others similary situated and Jose L. Parra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Doe v. Purdue University, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3565
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN DOE
Defendant - Appellee: PURDUE UNIVERSITY, PURDUE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, MITCHELL ELIAS DANIELS, JR., individually and as agent for Purdue University and others
Rachel Whitaker, et al v. Appriss, Inc.
as 17-2679
Plaintiff - Appellant: RACHEL A. WHITAKER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and RICHARD L. DUNKIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: APPRISS, INC.
Melissa Nihiser v. Lonnie Lutz, et al
as 17-1900
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELISSA NIHISER
Defendant - Appellee: LONNIE L. LUTZ, individually and in his official capacity as Coles County Public Defender, C. STEPHEN FERGUSON, individually and in his official capacity as Coles County State's Attorney and COLES COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Thaddeus Jones, et al v. Michelle Qualkinbush, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1227
Plaintiff - Appellant: THADDEUS JONES, individually, STEVON GRANT, individually and as a Member of Calumet City Concerned Citizens and CALUMET CITY CONCERNED CITIZENS, an Illinois political action committee
Defendant - Appellee: MICHELLE QUALKINBUSH, individually and her official capacity as Mayor of the City of Calumet City, Illinois, NYOTA FIGGS, individually and in her official capacity as City Clerk for the City of Calumet City, Illinois, MAGDALENA L. WOSCZYNSKI, individually and in her official capacity as Alderman of the City of Calumet City, Illinois and others
Thaddeus Jones, et al v. Michelle Qualkinbush, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3514
Plaintiff - Appellant: THADDEUS JONES, individually, STEVON GRANT, individually and as a Member of Calumet City Concerned Citizens and CALUMET CITY CONCERNED CITIZENS, an Illinois political action committee
Defendant - Appellee: MICHELLE QUALKINBUSH, individually and her official capacity as Mayor of the City of Calumet City, Illinois, NYOTA FIGGS, individually and in her official capacity as City Clerk for the City of Calumet City, Illinois, MAGDALENA L. WOSCZYNSKI, individually and in her official capacity as Alderman of the City of Calumet City, Illinois and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1064
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?