Cases 1 - 10 of 459
Smith v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv06166
Defendant:
Dart, Myers, McCray and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffee v. Wexford Healthcare et al
as 3:2024cv01705
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Coffee
Defendant:
Dr. Myers, Mrs. Desai and Nurse Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Munoz-Perez v. Myers
as 3:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Martin Munoz-Perez
Defendant:
Dr Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Barwick et al
as 3:2024cv02125
Defendant:
Bob Plum, John Barwick, Christine Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morris v. Barwick et al
as 3:2024cv01649
Defendant:
Dr. Percy Myers, John Barwick and IDOC
Plaintiff:
Barry Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. LOREAL USA Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv07651
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc, Namaste Laboratories LLC, SoftSheen - Carson, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cooks v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01929
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc and Percy Myers
Plaintiff:
Bobby Cooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01934
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Nurse James, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50344
Defendant:
William Bruno, Mirella Susnjar, Jane Marinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01763
Defendant:
Dr Myers, Latoya Hughes, Wexford and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
