Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Camelot Investment Company, Inc. v. Ohio Security Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv00828
Plaintiff:
Camelot Investment Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Ohio Security Insurance Company , Owens Corning Sales, LLC and Owens Corning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAGG v. OWENS CORNING SALES, LLC
as 1:2014cv01604
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R BRAGG
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING SALES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
William Jackson v. Owens Corning/Fiberboard Asbes
as 14-2471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JACKSON, a disabled person
Defendant - Appellee:
OWENS CORNING/FIBERBOARD ASBESTOS PI TRUST
William Jackson v. Owens Corning/Fiberboard Asbe
as 14-2171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JACKSON, a disabled person
Defendant - Appellee:
OWENS CORNING/FIBERBOARD ASBESTOS PI TRUST
Maag et al v. Owens Corning et al
as 3:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
Edward Maag and Diane Maag
Defendant:
Owens Corning and Owens Corning Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Owens Corning/Fiberboard Abestos PI Trust
as 1:2013cv02533
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
Owens Corning/Fiberboard Abestos PI Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jackson v. Owen Corning, Asbestos Settlement Trust
as 1:2012cv09208
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
Owen Corning, Asbestos Settlement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jackson v. Owens Corning, Asbestos Settlement Trust
as 1:2012cv04525
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
Owens Corning, Asbestos Settlement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US Minerals LLC v. Owens Corning
as 2:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
US Minerals LLC
Defendant:
Owens Corning and Owens Corning
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Anderson v. Owens-Corning Corp et al
as 2:2007cv00203
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Anderson
Defendant:
Owens-Corning Corp, Johns Manville Corp, WR Grace & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
