Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horrell v. Baker
as 2:2023cv02208
Petitioner:
Phillip Lee Horrell
Respondent:
Tyrone Baker
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paulsen v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00195
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Paulsen
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq01780
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kathy Lee and Phillip Lee
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horrell v. Downey
as 2:2017cv02306
Petitioner:
Phillip Lee Horrell
Respondent:
Michael D Downey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv01498
Petitioner:
PHILLIP LEE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv00709
Petitioner:
PHILLIP LEE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip Lee v. Dushan Zatecky
as 13-1688
Petitioner:
PHILLIP LEE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
McGinnis et al v. Officers of the State of Illinois
as 3:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lee McGinnis, All Non-Lawyer, Non-State Officers, Persons of Illinois, Katelin Grace McGinnis and others
Defendant:
Officers of the State of Illinois, Bond County, Fayette County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
