Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pitre et al v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
as 1:2022cv05623
Plaintiff:
Kingston Pitre and Kendra Robinson
Defendant:
Mead Johnson & Company LLC and Mead Johnson Nutrition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pitre v. Bechtold
as 1:2021cv00228
Plaintiff:
Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Jacob Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. Bechtold
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pitre and Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Jacob Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. Whitley Superior Court
as 1:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pitre and Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Whitley Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACA Motors, Inc. d/b/a Continental Acura et al v. WHI Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03549
Plaintiff:
JCF Autos LLC, Pitre, Inc., Pitre Importsm, LLC and others
Defendant:
WHI Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
In Re: Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv00864
Defendant:
Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation, Computerized Vehicle Registration, Inc., CDK Vehicle Registration and others
Plaintiff:
Kenny Thomas Enterprises, Inc, H&H Continental Motors, Inc., Loop LLC and others
Respondent:
PENSA LLC, Dominion Enterprises, Inc., XCELERATED, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Authenticom, Inc.
Petitioner:
InDesign Data, LLC, Accel-KKR Capital Partners, IV, LP, Christopher Massaroni and others
Intervenor:
DBW Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01958
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pitre v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv11163
Plaintiff:
Crystal Pitre
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
