Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Qadeer v. Pooja Trading Co.,
as 1:2022cv04716
Plaintiff:
Syed Qadeer
Defendant:
Pooja Trading Co., d/b/a 7-11 and Pooja Trading Co. doing business as 7-11
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VOELKER v. ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02367
Plaintiff:
JOHN VOELKER
Defendant:
POOJA KILARU and ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pooja Khungar v. Access Community Health Networ
as 20-1958
Defendant / Appellee:
ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
POOJA KHUNGAR, Doctor
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2018cv01455
Plaintiff:
Pooja Khungar
Defendant:
Access Community Health Network
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Khungar v. Access Community Health Center
as 1:2018cv01454
Defendant:
Access Community Health Center
Plaintiff:
Pooja Khungar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Oakley, Inc. v. Yiyi, et al
as 1:2015cv05963
Defendant:
Tehmina, Davis, Tentxung Youxian Gongsi and others
Plaintiff:
Chhavi, Patel, Mary and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Marin et al v. Devi, Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00760
Plaintiff:
Rafael Marin , Francisco Patino , Rigoberto Garcia and others
Defendant:
Devi, Enterprises, Inc., Jayesh Rawal and Pooja Rawal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
7-Eleven, Inc. v. Devi Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06354
Plaintiff:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Defendant:
Devi Enterprises, Inc., Pooja V. Rawal and Jayesh M. Rawal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
