Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kelly v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
as 1:2022cv04301
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kelly
Defendant:
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Forslund v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
as 1:2022cv04260
Plaintiff:
Robin Forslund, Timothy Kelly and Matthew Menting
Defendant:
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY GROUP BENEFITS PLAN et al
as 1:2015cv01496
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY GROUP BENEFITS PLAN
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CATTERSON v. R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY GROUP BENEFITS PLAN et al
as 1:2012cv00379
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY GROUP BENEFITS PLAN and RR DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DEBRA CATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frerck v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company et al
as 1:2010cv06807
Plaintiff:
Robert Frerck
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company v. Hewlett-Packard Company
as 1:2010cv05494
Plaintiff:
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
