Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wright v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
as 1:2023cv14904
Plaintiff:
Yvette Wright
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
FUJI UN-YU (USA), INC. v. Bunzl Retail Services, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05395
Plaintiff:
FUJI UN-YU (USA), INC.
Defendant:
Bunzl Retail Services, LLC, schwartz paper company and Schwarz Paper Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Unknown v Unknown
as 1:2022cv05394
Plaintiff:
FUJI UN-YU (USA), INC.
Defendant:
Bunzl Retail Services, LLC and schwartz paper company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DOBBS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOBBS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, POWERHOUSE RETAIL SERVICES, LLC and IMPERIAL REMODELING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bunzl Retail Services, LLC v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03761
Plaintiff:
Bunzl Retail Services, LLC
Defendant:
Mid Atlantic Medical Services LLC, Peter Krieger, Alexander P Grikitis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
