Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2023cv16246
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNIN-CORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Yiwu fengqi fitness equipment and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. and Ubisoft, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv05974
Plaintiff:
Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. and Ubisoft, Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, aabardsleyovoykjl, AAbbfgh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Levi Strauss & Co. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv07047
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", UETEEY-H Store, CWZZ Store and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bulgari, S.p.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv06955
Plaintiff:
Bulgari, S.p.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Ling Su Yun, chacha-photographer.be and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Rindahl v. Daugaard et al
as 2:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Dennis Daugaard, Marty Jackley, Aaron McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rindahl v. Daugaard et al
as 2:2011cv00304
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Dennis Daugaard, Tim Reisch, D Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
