Cases 1 - 10 of 2,622
Justise v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Charles E Justise, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FIELDS v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
JAY JAMES FIELDS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MCMURRY v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00951
Petitioner:
JEROME ROBERT MCMURRY, II
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Lyndon C Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
John B Myles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
John B Myles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunaway v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00441
Petitioner:
Chad A Dunaway
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Lyndon C Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
