Cases 1 - 10 of 4,200
Debter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Debter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Duke v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Donna J Duke
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rozelski v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Laurie A Rozelski
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Baker v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Benny Gibson Baker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Woodell v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodell, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
James v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Timothy Arthur James
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Starr v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Mary Starr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Zell v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Rebecca D Zell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hollis v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Steven G Hollis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
