Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Scott Luke v. Department of Human Service- Cerro Gordo, et al
as 24-1797
Plaintiff:
Scott Randolph Luke, Individually and on behalf of AL
Defendant:
Department of Human Service- Cerro Gordo, Families First Counseling, Samantha Weigmann, Department of Human Service and others
Laveida Jones v. Randolph County, AR, et al
as 15-2963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Laveida Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Randolph County, Arkansas, David Jansen, in his official capacity, Randy Patterson, in his individual capacity and others
Stevon Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance and Fire, et al
as 14-1850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stevon Anzaldua
Defendant - Appellee:
Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District, Derek Mays, in his individual capacity, Robert Lee, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Clarence Young, in his official capacity as the Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District Board Member, Bridget Quinlisk-Dailey, in her official capacity as the Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District Board Member and Kate Welge, in her individual capacity
Jason K. Stennes v. Summit Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 12-3866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason K. Stennes
Defendant - Appellee:
Summit Mortgage Corporation, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Shapiro & Zielke, LLP and others
Ruby Langdon v. State of Missouri, et al
as 12-3636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ruby Kathleen Langdon
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Circuit Court of Randolph County and Tara Becker Ashburn
Eldon Bugg v. Peggy Boots, et al
as 09-2264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eldon K.. Bugg
Defendant - Appellee:
Peggy Boots, Clerk of Randolph County Circuit Court and Honorable Cynthia Suter, Associate Circuit Judge
Bonnie Poehl v. Carl Randolph, et al
as 06-3382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bonnie Poehl
Defendant - Appellee:
Carl Randolph, Officer and City of Vinita Park
Defendant:
Vinita Park Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
