Cases 121 - 130 of 10,010
Marcus Allen v. John Yates
as 24-1565
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen
Defendant:
United States of America and John P. Yates
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Deaver Davis v. Warden Teresa Bettinger, et al
as 24-1568
Petitioner:
Deaver D. Davis
Respondent:
Warden Teresa Bettinger and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Antiona Phillips v. Donald Compton, et al
as 24-1575
Plaintiff:
Antiona Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Donald Compton, Rehab Program Manager, ADC, Pierce, Mental Health Advocate Supervisor, ADC, Dexter Payne, Chief Assistant Deputy Director, DOC and others
Bruce Smith, Jr. v. SD Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edgar Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections, Douglas L. Weber, Warden, Laura May, Coordinator of STOP and others
Shawn Spottswood v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1520
Petitioner:
Shawn Clarke Spottswood
Respondent:
State of Minnesota and Washington County, 10th Judicial District
Matthew Houston v. Encore Event Technologies, et al
as 24-1531
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies, Encore Event Services, Freeman Companies and others
Shane Lonix v. Musselwhite, et al
as 24-1527
Plaintiff:
Shane Ashton Lonix
Defendant:
Musselwhite, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, Merlin Fitzpatrick, Lt., Cummins Unit, ADC, Hayes, Mental Health Advisor, Cummins Unit, ADC and others
Brent McJunkins v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1506
Plaintiff:
Brent Charles McJunkins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Corrections
Kyle Dalen v. Jodi Harpstead
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jerome Dalen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, in her individual and official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
