Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Raphael Mendez v. Mr. Gilk, et al
as 15-1206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Mr. Gilk, Calvin Wedington, Other Unknown at FMC Rochester, Minn., et al. and others
Raphael Mendez v. Counselor Rosemark, et al
as 14-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Counselor Rosemark, Case Manager Cosette and Other Unknown Members at FMC Rochester, Minnesota, et al.
Raphael Mendez v. Warden B.R. Jett, et al
as 13-2719
Petitioner - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Respondent - Appellee:
Warden B.R. Jett, FMC Rochester, MN, Unit Manager M. Haugen and SIS S. Hansen
Ivan Mendez v. United States, et al
as 12-3532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ivan Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, One of the Conected Wired Members, of a Big International Criminal Organization, The Conected Wired Member and others
Raphael Mendez v. Warden B. Jett, et al
as 12-3174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Warden B. R. Jett and FMC Legal Mail Room
Felipe Mendez, Jr. v. United State
as 12-2567
Petitioner - Appellant:
Felipe Mendez, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Raphael Mendez v. United States, et al
as 12-1999
Petitioner - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America, Warden B. R. Jett, et al., Marty Haugen, Unit Manager and others
Ivan Mendez v. Connected Wire Member
as 12-1946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ivan Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Connected Wire Members of a big international criminal organization
Ivan Mendez v. Ms. Winny
as 11-3416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ivan Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Ms. Winny
Raphael Mendez v. James M. Rosenbaum, et al
as 11-2857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
James M. Rosenbaum, Federal Judge, U.S. Dist. Ct. Minn., Raymond L. Erickson, Federal Magistrate, U.S. Dist. Ct. Minn., Mary Haugen, Unit Manager, FMC Rochester, Minn. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
