Cases 41 - 50 of 115
Charles Thompson v. Ray Hobbs
as 14-3376
Petitioner - Appellant:
Charles Thompson
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Nicholas Stroeder v. Cate Thompson
as 14-2764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas Thomas Stroeder
Defendant - Appellee:
Cate Thompson, Financial Officer at Rush City Prison
Timothy Thompson v. Larry Denney
as 14-2036
Petitioner - Appellant:
Timothy Thompson
Respondent - Appellee:
Larry Denney, Warden
Steven Taylor v. Jay Cassady, et al
as 14-1870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven E. Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
Jay Cassady, JCCC Warden, George Lombardi, Director MO DOC, J. Wallace, SECC Warden and others
Stafon Thompson v. Tom Roy
as 14-1821
Petitioner - Appellant:
Stafon Edward Thompson
Respondent - Appellee:
Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections
Jermaine Ewing v. Dewayne Kempker, et al
as 14-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jermaine S. Ewing
Defendant - Appellee:
Dewayne Kempker, Deputy Division Director Adult Institutions, Ian Wallace, Warden, Southeast Correctional Center, William Stange, Assistant Warden, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Kendrick Thompson v. Ray Hobb
as 13-3696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kendrick Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Fredrick Mason v. Wendy Kelly, et al
as 13-3001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fredrick Mason
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelly, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marie Austin, Infirmary Administrator, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Iona Wade, Former Nurse, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Kurtis Culbert v. Tony Thompson, et al
as 13-2996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kurtis M. Culbert
Defendant - Appellee:
Tony Thompson, Sheriff, Richard Boeschen, Captain, Lt. Herbst and others
Douglas Thompson v. Larry Denney
as 13-2869
Petitioner - Appellant:
Douglas W. Thompson
Respondent - Appellee:
Larry Denney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
