Cases 41 - 50 of 320
Bryce Woods v. Arkansas Department of Correct, et al
as 16-4389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bryce Woods
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, North Central Unit, Brickeys Unit and others
Michael Kelley v. United State
as 16-4361
Movant - Appellant:
Michael Kelley
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Dellemond Cunningham v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dellemond Cunningham
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, originally named Wendy Kelly
Brian Hicks v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction
Eugene Thomas, III v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Thomas, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Billy Nichols, Jr. v. Charlotte Sanders, et al
as 16-4135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Charlotte Sanders, Sergeant, Tucker Maximum Security Unit, Johnson, Sergeant, Tucker Maximum Security Unit, Burl, Warden, Tucker Maximum Security Unit and others
Howard Wood, Jr. v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Howard Wood, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Walter McCullough v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Walter A. McCullough
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Larry Norris)
Jessie Hill v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jessie Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Jimmy Cantrell v. Arkansas Dept. of Correct, et al
as 16-4100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Asa Hutchinson, Governor, State of Arkansas, City of Little Rock and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
