Cases 51 - 60 of 10,007
Rodney Hurdsman v. Rodney Wright, et al
as 24-1997
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant:
Viapath Technologies, Inc., formerly known as Globel Tel-Link, Rodney Wright, Sheriff, Saline County, Saline County, Arkansas and others
Shawn Otte v. Arron Wilson, et al
as 24-1992
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Michael Fusselman and others
Erik Becerra v. United States
as 24-1686
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Reginald Dunahue v. Curry Branham, et al
as 24-1983
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Kendrick Avery, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Aundrea Culclager, Warden, Tucker Max, ADC and others
Keith Washington v. Minnesota DOC, et al
as 24-1962
Plaintiff:
Keith Eugene Washington, also known as Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Supervisor Officials, sued in their individual capacities, MCF Oak Park Heights, MCF Stillwater and others
Phillip Pond v. Daniel Mosteller, et al
as 24-1972
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Pond
Respondent:
Daniel C. Mosteller, United States Marshals, Kevin Thom and others
Howard Leach v. State of Arkansas
as 24-1968
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Leach
Defendant:
State of Arkansas
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Javon Gardner v. Stephen Lane, et al
as 24-1965
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Norton, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, S. Davis, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
