Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Darryl Chambers v. Chelsea De La Cruz, et al
as 23-1205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darryl R. Chambers
Defendant / Appellee:
Chelsea De La Cruz, Case Manager, Tecumseh State Prison, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center, Scott R. Frakes, Director, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center, Michael Coleman, Case Manager, Nebraska State Penitentiary, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center and others
Sease Beard v. Doris Falkenrath, et al
as 22-2893
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sease Michael Beard
Defendant / Appellant:
Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC, Nathan Falter, CO III, JCCC, Carignan, CO I, JCCC and others
Defendant:
John Does, 1-5, Jane or John Doe, 6 and Jane Doe, 7
Norris Andrews v. Sheriff Joel Brott, et al
as 22-2269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Deshon Andrews
Defendant:
Joel L. Brott, Sheriff of Sherburne County, in his personal capacity, Sgt. Tom Zerwas, Correction Officer of Sherburne Co. Jail sued in his personal capacitys, Captain Bloom, Correction Officer of Sherburne Co. Jail sued in his personal capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Diana Van DerBeek, Nursing Director of Sherburne Co. Jail Also Employee of MEnD Correctional Care Inc sued in her personal capacity, Janelle Hussain, Medical Provider of the Sherburne Co. Jail Also Employee of MEnD Correctional Care Inc. sued in her personal capacity, Unidentified MEnD Correctional Care Employees, Does 1-5 sued in their personal capacitys and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
