Cases 71 - 80 of 144
Craig Hunter v. Larry Denney
as 14-3814
Petitioner - Appellant:
Craig D. Hunter
Respondent - Appellee:
Larry Denney, Warden
William Carter v. Jason Kefer, et al
as 14-3812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant - Appellee:
Jason Kefer, Dr., David Hunter, Dr. and John "Ed" Buckley, Dr.
Michael Hunter v. Ron Herrington, et al
as 14-3342
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Howard Hunter
Respondent - Appellee:
Ron Herrington, U.S. Marshals Service and Linda Sanders, Warden
Michael Howard Hunter v. United States
as 14-3331
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Howard Hunter
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Walter Farver, Sr. v. Greg Bolin, et al
as 14-2062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Walter B. Farver, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Greg Bolin, Chief, W.C. "Dub" Brassell Adult Detention Center (originally named as Bolin), Tyra Tyler, Major, W.C. "Dub" Brassell Adult Detention Center (originally named as Tyler) and Hunter Carrington, M.D., W.C. "Dub" Brassell Adult Detention Center (originally named as Carrington Hunter)
United States v. Michael Howard Hunter
as 14-1997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Howard Hunter
Phasung Baccam v. Sheriff Keith Ferguson, et al
as 14-1940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Phasung Lu Baccam
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Keith Ferguson, Benton County, Arkansas, Captain Holly and Captain Hunter Petry
William Carter v. Jason Kefer, et al
as 14-1905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant - Appellee:
Jason Kefer, Dr., David Hunter, Dr. and John "Ed" Buckley, Dr.
Ramon McGraw v. Edward Adams, et al
as 14-1638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Captain Edward Adams, W.C. Dub Brassell Detention Facility, Jefferson County Jail, Pine Bluff County Jail, Southeast Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare, Mental Healh Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
