Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Darryl Chambers v. Chelsea De La Cruz, et al
as 23-1205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darryl R. Chambers
Defendant / Appellee:
Chelsea De La Cruz, Case Manager, Tecumseh State Prison, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center, Scott R. Frakes, Director, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center, Michael Coleman, Case Manager, Nebraska State Penitentiary, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center and others
Sease Beard v. Doris Falkenrath, et al
as 22-2893
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sease Michael Beard
Defendant / Appellant:
Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC, Nathan Falter, CO III, JCCC, Carignan, CO I, JCCC and others
Defendant:
John Does, 1-5, Jane or John Doe, 6 and Jane Doe, 7
Norris Andrews v. Sheriff Joel Brott, et al
as 22-2269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Deshon Andrews
Defendant:
Joel L. Brott, Sheriff of Sherburne County, in his personal capacity, Sgt. Tom Zerwas, Correction Officer of Sherburne Co. Jail sued in his personal capacitys, Captain Bloom, Correction Officer of Sherburne Co. Jail sued in his personal capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Diana Van DerBeek, Nursing Director of Sherburne Co. Jail Also Employee of MEnD Correctional Care Inc sued in her personal capacity, Janelle Hussain, Medical Provider of the Sherburne Co. Jail Also Employee of MEnD Correctional Care Inc. sued in her personal capacity, Unidentified MEnD Correctional Care Employees, Does 1-5 sued in their personal capacitys and others
Alex Nelson, et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 21-3740
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alex Nelson and Iris Nelson
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gerald Leyshock, COI, in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Charlene Deeken and John Does, 1-3
Emily Davis v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3526
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Emily Davis
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities and Charlene Deeken
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
James Tanner v. Kurt Ziegenhorn, et al
as 21-3462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Andrew Tanner
Defendant / Appellee:
Kurt Ziegenhorn, in his individual capacity, Bill Bryant, Colonel, in his official capacity as head of the Arkansas State Police, an agency of the State of Arkansas and William Sadler, "Bill", in his individual capacity
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-5, individually and in their official capacity, Mike Kennedy, Individually and Elizabeth Chapman, Individually
Dillan Newbold v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dillan Newbold
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Terrence Ruffin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual an official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, T., in his individual and official capacities and others
Brian Baude v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 20-2864
Defendant / Appellant:
Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Bockskopf, Matthew T. Karnowski, SGT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Brian Baude
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri and John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
