Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States v. Kylee Starr
as 23-3010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kylee Jade Starr, also known as Kylee Jade Knight
United States v. Jade LaRoche
as 22-2969
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jade LaRoche
Jade Mound, et al v. The United States of America
as 22-1721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jade Mound, and on behalf of the heirs at law Personal Representative Trudy Peterson estate of Trudy Peterson, Ron Vander Wal, and on behalf of the heirs at law Personal Representative James Vander Wal estate of James Vander Wal, Evan Thompson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The United States of America
Vanessa Dundon, et al v. Kyle Kirchmeier, et al
as 22-1246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vanessa Dundon, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons, Jade Kalikolehuaokal Wool, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons, Crystal Wilson, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Hoagland-Lynn, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons and Noah Michael Treanor, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons
Defendant / Appellee:
Kyle Kirchmeier, Morton County, City of Mandan and others
United States v. Jade Monahan
as 21-3611
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jade Daniel Joseph Monahan
Vanessa Dundon, et al v. Kyle Kirchmeier, et al
as 20-3106
Defendant / Appellant:
Chad Kaiser, Kyle Kirchmeier and Jason Ziegler
Defendant:
Does 1-100, Morton County, Stutsman County and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jade Kalikolehuaokal Wool, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons, David Demo, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons, Mariah Marie Bruce, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons and others
Reproductive Health Svcs, et al v. Parson, et al
as 19-3134
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc., on behalf of itself, its physicians, its staff, and its patients and DO, MSCI, FACOG Colleen P. McNicholas, on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant:
Kimberly Gardner, in her official capacity as the Circuit Attorney for the City of St. Louis
Defendant / Appellant:
MD Naveed Razzaque, in his official capacity as a Member of the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, Katherine J. Matthews, in her official capacity as a Member of the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, Michael L. Parson, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Missouri and others
Not Yet Classified:
Alliance Defending Freedom
Reproductive Health Svcs, et al v. Parson, et al
as 19-2882
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc., on behalf of itself, its physicians, its staff, and its patients and DO, MSCI, FACOG Colleen P. McNicholas, on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant:
Kimberly Gardner, in her official capacity as the Circuit Attorney for the City of St. Louis
Defendant / Appellant:
MD Naveed Razzaque, in his official capacity as a Member of the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, Katherine J. Matthews, in her official capacity as a Member of the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, Michael L. Parson, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Missouri and others
Judy Doe v. Michael L. Parson, et al
as 19-1578
Defendant / Appellee:
David E. Tannenhill, D.O., Member of the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, Sara Martin, PhD, Member of the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, James A. Direnna, D.O., Member of the Missouri Board of Regstration for the Healing Arts and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Judy Doe
United States v. Jade Oldrock
as 16-2633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jade Shilo Oldrock
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
