Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Randall McArty v. Daniel Turner, et al
as 22-3299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randall Thomas McArty
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Odell Turner, Prosecuting Attorney, Clark County, Arkansas and Leslie Rutledge, Arkansas Attorney General
Dewey Hopper v. Michele Buckner
as 22-1850
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dewey Odell Hopper
Respondent / Appellee:
Michele Buckner, Superintendent
Dewey Hopper v. Michele Buckner
as 22-1319
Petitioner:
Dewey Odell Hopper
Respondent:
Michele Buckner, Superintendent
Dewey Hopper v. Michele Buckner
as 21-3631
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dewey Odell Hopper
Respondent / Appellee:
Michele Buckner, Superintendent
Dewey Hopper v. Michele Buckner
as 21-3566
Petitioner:
Dewey Odell Hopper
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Dewey Hopper v. Michele Buckner
as 21-2709
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dewey Odell Hopper
Respondent / Appellee:
Michele Buckner, Superintendent
Larry Davis v. Prosecutor Blake Badston, et al
as 19-2904
Defendant:
Prosecutor Kim Davis, Judge Gary Arnold, Officer Ryan Childers and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry David Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Deputy Prosecutor Daniel Odell Turner, Lt. Detective Brian Daniel, Clark County Sheriff's Office, Prosecutor Blake Badston and others
Jessie Hill v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 15-2892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jessie Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Warden, Tuckr MSU, Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, Internal Affairs and others
Michael Benjamin v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Benjamin
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, A.D.C. Director, William Straughn, Warden, Maurice Williams, Major and others
Jacob Meeks v. Bob Boydston, et al
as 12-1882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacob Meeks
Defendant - Appellee:
Bob Boydston, Sheriff, Deputy Allen, Deputy Odell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
