Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Jesus Sanchez-Banos v. Merrick Garland
as 24-2241
Petitioner:
Jesus Sanchez-Banos
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Marco Sanchez-Diaz v. Southeast Correctional Center
as 23-3743
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Sanchez-Diaz
Defendant:
Southeast Correctional Center, Department of Corrections
United States v. Alan Sanchez
as 23-3687
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alan E. Sanchez
Taqueria El Primo LLC, et al v. IL Farmers Insurance Co., et al
as 23-3128
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Taqueria El Primo LLC, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Victor Manuel Delgado Jimenez, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Mitchelle Chavez Solis, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Illinois Farmers Insurance Company, Farmers Insurance Exchange, Farmers Group, Inc. and others
Eva Becerril-Sanchez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3349
Petitioner:
Eva Maria Becerril-Sanchez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Ruben Rios-Sanchez v. United States
as 23-3107
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ruben Rios-Sanchez
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Anthony Malone, Sr. v. Does, et al
as 23-2387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Dewayne Malone, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Does, Officer Jaimie, Robert Case, Jail Administrator, Greene County, Steve Franks, Sheriff, Greene County and others
United States v. Jose Adame
as 23-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Sanchez Adame
United States v. Jesus Sanchez-Meza
as 23-1357
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesus R. Sanchez-Meza
Saul Aguilar-Sanchez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3598
Petitioner:
Saul Aguilar-Sanchez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
