Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Scott v. Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC
as 4:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Doyle Scott
Defendant:
Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Muckerman v. Genasci
as 4:2014cv01844
Plaintiff:
David G. Muckerman
Defendant:
Arthur Genasci, Wayne E. Anthony, Harold Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Torres et al v. Simpatico, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv02373
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres , Guadalupe Clemente , Luz Walker and others
Defendant:
Simpatico, Inc., Stratus Franchising, LLC, Peter Frese, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Raineri Construction, LLC v. Taylor, et al
as 4:2012cv02297
Plaintiff:
Raineri Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Carpenters District Council of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity , Scott Byrne , Paul Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cheong v. K-V Pharmaceutical Company et al
as 4:2011cv01905
Plaintiff:
Hoichi Cheong
Defendant:
K-V Pharmaceutical Company, Gregory J. Divis, Jr. and Scott Goedeke
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mukku v. K-V Pharmaceutical Company et al
as 4:2011cv01888
Plaintiff:
Ramakrishna Mukku
Defendant:
K-V Pharmaceutical Company, Gregory J. Divis, Jr. and Scott Goedeke
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
IN RE: K-V Pharmaceutical Company Securities Litigation
as 4:2011cv01816
Plaintiff:
Frank Julianello
Defendant:
K-V Pharmaceutical Company, Gregory J. Divis, Jr. and Scott Goedeke
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
